Time Magazine Article Casts Cynical Eye on Morganza "Leaky Levee" - True Voice of the Wetlands

True Voice of the Wetlands

Click on image to enlarge Click on image to enlarge
Images Provided By Lucrece Art

How Shell Has Privatized & Controls Louisiana, & Selects Windell Curole & Jerome Zeringue to Lead the State's New Coastal Panel

R. King Milling Should Resign as Chair of CPRA of Louisiana

VOICE of the WETLANDS is SAVE OUR WETLANDS

Save Our Wetlands Sues Terrebonne Levee District to Stop Morganza Levee Construction

Shell's America's Wetlands is Fueling the Coast

AMERICA'S WETLANDS IS SHELL OIL

Sixteen Coastal Scientist Object to Morganza "Leaky Levee"

Six Reasons Why Morganza "Leaky Levees" Are Unproven Storm Protection

Bobby Jindal Pushes 11 Billion $Dollar$ Morganza "Leaky Levee" Pork Barrell Project

Morganza: Salvation or 'Scam'?

Important Lessons Which the Morganza "Leaky Levee" Project Ignores

Houma Navigational Channel(HNC) the other "Hurricane Highway"

Morganza's $10.7 Billion Cost Estimate Stuns Officials

VOICE of the WETLANDS exposes Americas Wetlands=Shell Oil

Time Magazine Article Casts Cynical Eye on Morganza "Leaky Levee"

Windell Curole Pushes 11 Billion $Dollar$ Morganza "Leaky Levee" Pork Barrell Project

Terrebonne Levee Director Accuses Save Our Wetlands of Flooding New Orleans

Houma Courier Article Does Not Tell the Whole Story

Was a Permit Necessary to Build Local Levee?

Lawmakers Ask State For Help With Morganza Lawsuit

Americas Wetlands is Shell Oil

Save Our Wetlands

Time Magazine Article Casts Cynical Eye on Morganza "Leaky Levee"

  1. August 7, 2007
  2. By Robert Morris
  3. Senior Staff Writer
  4. Source: http://www.houmatoday.co

HOUMA, LOUISIANA - Time magazine released an August 1st 2007 cover story deriding Morganza as "providing a false sense of security to vulnerable towns while increasing their vulnerability," referring to the project as a commitment of "billions of dollars to protect middle-of-nowhere fishing towns."

MISTAKES OF THE PAST

In the Morganza debate, some scientists and engineers, such as LSU Hurricane Center Deputy Director Ivor van Heerden, criticize the levee approach, saying the $900 million, 72-mile project will destroy area wetlands and provide residents with a false sense of security.

The Time article is planted firmly in the viewpoint of those who oppose the massive levee. Its author, Michael Grunwald, is a former Washington Post reporter who has won numerous awards for investigative reporting critical of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its projects. Familiar with the New Orleans' flood-protection system, he covered the corps' culpability during the Hurricane Katrina levee breaches for The Post, and was then hired by Time.

"I do come into this with a point of view, but it's developed through eight years of reporting," Grunwald said in an interview with The Courier. He notes that the magazine allows him to advance his conclusions more aggressively than a newspaper would. "This is all factual, not a matter of opinion, but there is a little more of making judgments from the facts."

The point of his article, he said, is that the Morganza project, which is 15 years in the making, is part of the overall history of flawed engineering that dams the river, drained wetlands, inadequately protected population centers and allowed so many levee breaches in New Orleans. The scientists criticizing Morganza are the same that criticized New Orleans' destined-to-fail defenses, while the same agency that built New Orleans is now designing Morganza.

"I think Morganza is an example not just of a pre-Katrina project -- it's a pre-Katrina mentality," Grunwald said. "It assumes an endless supply of resources, it assumes you can do something for everybody, and it assumes you can do this without causing any economic harm. I argue that era should have ended Aug. 29," 2005.

Morganza is unrealistic because, during the decades it will take to be paid for and constructed, Terrebonne Parish will remain unprotected, Grunwald said. Meanwhile, the coast is going to continue to erode -- even without a storm -- and none of the down-the-bayou communities such as Chauvin or Dulac will survive anyway, he said.

Ultimately, the government needs to be more realistic about concentrating on the major population centers, such as Houma and New Orleans, and consider options such as home buyouts for those who live farther south, Grunwald said.

"It is going to be very tough when it's time to decide where to draw the line, but right now the leaders are pretending that decision doesn't have to be made. That's not only deceptive -- I think it's dangerous," Grunwald said. "We've got to do something for the people in Dulac, but building a wall around it may not be the thing."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) endorsed or sponsored by the originator. For more information go to:www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.